My husband (Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Michigan State University) asked me if there are set protocols for critiquing novels. I explained that I’ve used forms or lists of questions when preparing for critique discussions at workshops. Usually when I write up a critique, I discuss the big items: overall impression, character, plot, voice, setting and pacing. If there are aspects of the manuscript that require specific considerations, I add those topics.
He said, “When I’m reviewing a scientific paper, I ask two questions: is it right, and is it interesting.”
I said, “It’s the same.”
When is a novel right?
A novel is right when all the characters are fully realized individuals with lives, goals and dreams. The characters are so authentic that the reader is transported into the world of the book. These characters are struggling with real problems that impact their lives in meaningful ways. The reader follows the story to find out how these people cope with their problems. The setting is believable and self-consistent. The pacing flows at a tempo appropriate to the plot.
When is a novel interesting?
A novel is interesting when the lives, goals and dreams of the characters are in opposition. Even characters who love each other can’t want the same things to happen in the same way.
A novel is right when the author figures out character, voice, plot setting and pacing. A novel is interesting when the author figures out conflict.
Thank you, Ann, for your excellant insight!
Karen: It may have been Zach with the excellent insight.;-)